Jolie shower head review

This post may contain affiliate links. This means if you click on the link and purchase something, I will receive a commission with no extra cost to you. For more information, please read my disclaimer.


The Jolie Filtered Showerhead has taken social media by storm, promising cleaner water, better skin, and reduced hair shedding all from a single fixture. I’ve dug deep into the specs, lab results, and user experiences to give you a straight-talking breakdown of whether it’s worth your money.

Key Takeaways

  • The Jolie showerhead costs $165–$169 upfront, with ongoing filter costs pushing the five-year total to around $1,090.
  • It uses a KDF-55 and calcium sulfite dual-media filter that reduces chlorine effectively but cannot remove chloramine or disinfection byproducts.
  • A commissioned clinical trial found 81% of participants reported noticeable hair shedding reduction after 12 weeks.
  • Independent lab testing showed inconsistent chlorine reduction, ranging from 54% to 100% depending on local water supply.
  • Budget-conscious buyers and those in chloramine-heavy water areas may find better value with alternative filtered showerheads.

What Is the Jolie Showerhead?

The Jolie Filtered Showerhead is an all-in-one shower fixture from Jolie Skin Co. that combines a standard showerhead with a built-in water filter. It’s aimed at anyone who wants cleaner shower water without installing a separate inline filter unit.

It’s available in five finishes: Brushed Gold, Brushed Steel, Jet Black, Modern Chrome, and Vibrant Red. That kind of aesthetic variety is genuinely rare in the filtered showerhead category, and it’s one of the reasons it’s become a go-to for design-conscious bathroom upgrades.

The unit comes pre-loaded with a filter cartridge, and installation typically takes under 10 minutes. No plumber is needed — a wrench and plumber’s tape are included in the box.

Price and Subscription Breakdown

The Jolie showerhead retails at $165–$169 for a one-time purchase. Alternatively, you can pay $148 upfront and subscribe to replacement filters at $33 every 90 days — working out to around $0.40 per day.

Those filter costs add up fast. The annual filter expense alone is around $132 per year, pushing the Year 1 total to approximately $384 and the five-year total to roughly $1,090. That’s a significant financial commitment compared to many competitors.

According to Wittels McInturff Palikovic, there are also concerns about the cancellation process for the subscription, with a law firm investigation suggesting it may be deliberately difficult to cancel. Read the terms carefully before signing up for auto-renewal.

Filtration Technology: How It Works

The Jolie uses a dual-media filter combining KDF-55 (high-purity copper-zinc granules) and calcium sulfite. KDF-55 uses redox chemistry to convert chlorine into harmless chloride, which performs especially well in hot water. Calcium sulfite works in a similar way, converting free chlorine into safe salt compounds at temperatures above 100°F.

However, there’s a notable gap: no activated carbon is included. That means the Jolie can’t reduce disinfection byproducts (DBPs), trihalomethanes, or chloramine — a common alternative disinfectant used in many municipal water systems.

Independent lab results from Water Filter Guru’s Jolie shower filter review showed chlorine reduction ranging from 54% to 100% depending on local water. Water hardness was barely touched, dropping less than 1% from 128 PPM to 127 PPM, so if you’re dealing with hard water scaling, this won’t solve that problem.

One unexpected finding worth mentioning: zinc levels increased dramatically post-filtration — rising roughly 4,500% from 0.00919 PPM to 0.42455 PPM. This appears to be a result of zinc leaching from the KDF-55 media, and it’s something potential buyers should be aware of.

Clinical Trial Results: Hair and Skin Claims

Jolie commissioned a 12-week clinical trial through Lemma Labs, a female-led hair specialty laboratory. The results were notable — 81% of participants reported noticeable hair shedding reduction, and 59% saw greater than 33% shedding reduction over the trial period, according to Jolie Skin Co.’s clinical trials page.

Skin results were equally impressive on paper. Here’s what participants reported:

  • 100% of participants reported more hydrated skin
  • 96.9% reported less dry skin
  • 93.8% noticed improved skin complexion and texture
  • 68.8% reported less scalp itchiness
  • 62.5% saw reduced acne
  • 50% saw eczema symptom improvement

It’s worth noting that the trial was commissioned by Jolie itself, which introduces potential bias. Real-world user reviews are more mixed — some users report zero change in hair shedding or skin quality after 60+ days, and a small number noted increased scalp itchiness or faster hair greasing after switching.

There’s also a class action lawsuit that claims Jolie’s own data shows only around 66% chlorine reduction — far short of the full removal implied in marketing. That’s an important caveat if you’re purchasing specifically for chlorine filtration.

NSF Certification Concerns

Jolie’s marketing references NSF certification, but independent reviewers have found no formal NSF certification on record for the Jolie filter. NSF certification is the gold standard for water filtration claims, and without it, those performance claims carry less weight.

If independent certification matters to you — and it should — this is a meaningful gap. Verify claims independently before making your purchase decision, especially if you’re relying on this product for health-related filtration goals.

How It Compares to the Competition

The filtered showerhead market has grown considerably, and Jolie faces some stiff competition. Here’s how it stacks up against the main alternatives:

  • Canopy ($150 + $40/90 days): Includes activated carbon for DBP removal that Jolie can’t match; slightly higher flow rate at 2.33 GPM vs. Jolie’s 2.20 GPM, according to MindBodyGreen’s Jolie vs Canopy comparison
  • AquaBliss ($35–$60 + $18–$25 replacements): Budget-friendly option with 12-stage filtration including activated carbon and vitamin C; five-year cost of $200–$300 vs. Jolie’s $1,090
  • Second Shower (~$89 + ~$15 replacements): NSF-certified with 99.9% chlorine AND chloramine removal; Year 1 cost around $149 vs. Jolie’s $384, per Second Shower’s filter comparison blog
  • Weddell Duo (~$89.99): Ranked #1 in independent data-driven testing; 100% chlorine removal plus DBP elimination; five-year cost around $450 — $640 cheaper than Jolie with objectively stronger performance, according to Water Filter Guru’s best shower filter reviews
  • Hello Klean: Shares Jolie’s aesthetic focus but delivers noticeably weaker water pressure and has no clinical research to back its claims

On a pure cost-per-gallon and filtration performance basis, Jolie struggles to compete. Its real advantage lies in its design, brand story, and clinical trial marketing.

Who Should Buy the Jolie Showerhead?

The Jolie showerhead genuinely suits a specific type of buyer. If you’re design-conscious and want a beautiful bathroom fixture that also filters your water, it delivers on that promise. It also works well for users in chlorine-heavy water areas where DBPs and chloramine aren’t the primary concern.

I’d also recommend it for people who’ve already tried basic showerhead swaps without results and want something backed by at least some structured research. The clinical trial, flawed as it may be in terms of independence, gives a level of credibility you won’t find with most competitors.

On the other hand, I’d steer clear of the Jolie if you’re on a tight budget, live in a chloramine-treated water area, or need comprehensive contaminant filtration for conditions like eczema. For those situations, options like the Second Shower or AquaBliss offer more practical filtration at a fraction of the cost.

Final Verdict

The Jolie showerhead is a premium lifestyle product as much as it is a water filtration tool. It looks exceptional, installs easily, and has enough positive user sentiment and clinical backing to make it worth considering — if the price doesn’t put you off.

That said, it’s not the best performer on filtration metrics, it can’t handle chloramine, and the long-term subscription cost is steep. Go in with realistic expectations, check your local water chemistry first, and it could be a solid addition to your bathroom.

Sources

Water Filter Guru – Jolie Shower Filter Review
Jolie Skin Co. – The Jolie Showerhead Product Page
Jolie Skin Co. – Clinical Trials
Jolie Skin Co. – FAQ
ClassAction.org – Jolie Filtered Showerhead Lawsuit
Water Filter Guru – Canopy vs Jolie
MindBodyGreen – Jolie vs Canopy
Second Shower – Jolie vs AquaBliss Comparison
Wittels McInturff Palikovic – Jolie Investigation
Water Filter Guru – Best Shower Water Filter Reviews
Esquire – Jolie Shower Head Review
PhD in Clothes – An Unsponsored Jolie Shower Head Review

Similar Posts